Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)

[mitsumbushi@gmail.com]

(01-12-2023 02:52 AM)ToastyX Wrote:  

(01-10-2023 10:06 AM)mitsumbushi@gmail.com Wrote:  oc'd hp z24n g2 to 138hz without any hiccups.

I don't see how that's possible. 1920x1200 monitors generally don't overclock. Some will accept 75 Hz but skip frames at anything above 60 Hz. I don't expect most 60 Hz monitors to accept more than 75-85 Hz. Did you test it to make sure it was actually 138 Hz? What did you use: DVI, HDMI, or DisplayPort?

(01-10-2023 10:06 AM)mitsumbushi@gmail.com Wrote:  only nvidia custom resolution work for native resolution to 86hz.

any other custom resolution won't push beyond the standard 75hz at all.

This is closer to what I except.

yes it was 138hz confirmed via ufo frame skipping, n yes it did skipped a frame here n there but it was stable and clear all along until driver update. HDMI 2.0 4k ultra hi-speed ethernet, same cable and all.

[bobrob]

Hi ToastyX, any news if the latest 23.1.1 AMD driver has fixed EDID overrides ?

[Xocet]

(01-13-2023 01:40 AM)bobrob Wrote:  Hi ToastyX, any news if the latest 23.1.1 AMD driver has fixed EDID overrides ?

It hasn't, based on my testing. They also haven't mentioned it in the release notes

I've filed another bug report for the new driver version.

[xfvhn]

Hi!

I have the Samsung Neo G9 monitor and HP Probook G7 with Windows 11 (22H2).

Neo G9 have 3 ports: 1xDP 1.4 and 2xHDMI 2.1, and it`s resolution 5120*1440.

If I connect my ProBook to Neo with DP-Type-C cable - all is works fine and resolution is 5120*1440. But in case when I use some dockstation (of course they all are supporting up to 8k resolution) the resolution became 3840*1080. The same dockstation with MacBook air on M1 give me the proper resolution - 5120*1440.

I think what problem is windows is incorrect monitor resolution detect via docstation. So I have been tried to use CRU to set custom resolution. But I can`t add it, the 5120 is marking red. I was trying to add dysplay id 1.3 in bottom block, clear all entries where, but I always see 5120 is red when I`m trying to add detailed resolution in upper block...

   

   

What it`s wrong?

[ToastyX]

(01-13-2023 02:41 PM)xfvhn Wrote:  I have the Samsung Neo G9 monitor and HP Probook G7 with Windows 11 (22H2).

Neo G9 have 3 ports: 1xDP 1.4 and 2xHDMI 2.1, and it`s resolution 5120*1440.

If I connect my ProBook to Neo with DP-Type-C cable - all is works fine and resolution is 5120*1440. But in case when I use some dockstation (of course they all are supporting up to 8k resolution) the resolution became 3840*1080. The same dockstation with MacBook air on M1 give me the proper resolution - 5120*1440.

I think what problem is windows is incorrect monitor resolution detect via docstation. So I have been tried to use CRU to set custom resolution. But I can`t add it, the 5120 is marking red. I was trying to add dysplay id 1.3 in bottom block, clear all entries where, but I always see 5120 is red when I`m trying to add detailed resolution in upper block...

First, your screenshots show an EDID for a different monitor (Eizo EV2450). Second, your first screenshot shows you added it in the DisplayID 1.3 extension block, so why are you trying to add it again? Third, the monitor already defines the correct resolutions, so adding a custom resolution is pointless. There is a bandwidth limitation somewhere. Are you connecting more than one monitor to the docking station? The ProBook might not be able to handle the bandwidth for both monitors over a single DisplayPort connection.

[ToastyX]

(01-13-2023 03:10 AM)Xocet Wrote:  It hasn't, based on my testing. They also haven't mentioned it in the release notes

I've filed another bug report for the new driver version.

They don't list every known problem in the release notes. They will fix it if they get enough reports.

[ToastyX]

(01-12-2023 04:30 PM)mitsumbushi@gmail.com Wrote:  yes it was 138hz confirmed via ufo frame skipping, n yes it did skipped a frame here n there but it was stable and clear all along until driver update. HDMI 2.0 4k ultra hi-speed ethernet, same cable and all.

What are you using the patcher for? HDMI should not need the patcher if there's an HDMI data block. The main reason a resolution would not be listed is a pixel clock limit as described in the first post.

[bobrob]

(01-15-2023 02:32 PM)ToastyX Wrote:  

(01-13-2023 03:10 AM)Xocet Wrote:  It hasn't, based on my testing. They also haven't mentioned it in the release notes

I've filed another bug report for the new driver version.

They don't list every known problem in the release notes. They will fix it if they get enough reports.

I did also. You think it's a bug, just something they didn't have time to finish or is it a feature they have permanently disabled... Maybe to implement the new displayport 2.1

[Denox]

Hey guys,

Can someone please help me out setting up custom res of 3840*2160@120hz please ?

I'm running an RTX 3070 and I can't get anything above 60hz in Windows / NVIDIA Control Panel on my new TV QLED Q80 2022 serie
Firmware is up to date..

I tried every tips I found from YouTube / Internet..

My HDMI cable is 2.1 certified, TV is supposed to run 4K 120HZ on all HDMI ports but from reading it looks like it's a bug from Samsung's side...

Where should I go on CRU ? I'm a novice
Thanks for your help

[mitsumbushi@gmail.com]

(01-15-2023 02:34 PM)ToastyX Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 04:30 PM)mitsumbushi@gmail.com Wrote:  yes, it was 138hz confirmed via ufo frame skipping, n yes it skipped a frame here n there, but it was stable and clear until the driver updated. HDMI 2.0 4k ultra hi-speed ethernet, same cable and all.

What are you using the patcher for? HDMI should not need the patcher if there's an HDMI data block. The main reason a resolution would not be listed is a pixel clock limit as described in the first post.

thanx cta block HDMI +2.x and pixel clock limit helped back to 138.771hz
confirmed on ufo frame skipping

Although csgo wouldn't let me post 900x720 138hz, the display goes black, and the dialog box asks to return to optimal 60hz while in-game only. Desktop reso 900x720 138.771 works perfectly fine though.