AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
|
09-07-2012, 09:07 PM
(Last edited: 08-06-2024, 04:00 PM by ToastyX)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher modifies the AMD/ATI video driver to allow higher resolutions and refresh rates by removing the 165 MHz pixel clock limit for single-link DVI and HDMI, the 330 MHz limit for dual-link DVI, and the 400 MHz limit for VGA.
Download: atikmdag-patcher-1.4.15.zip - Source: atikmdag-patcher-1.4.15-src.zip A message from ToastyX: Requirements:
To restore the unpatched driver, run the patcher again and click "Yes" to restore from backup. Unpatching is not required before upgrading drivers. Simply run the patcher again after installing the new driver. Options: You can rename the .exe file to change certain options:
|
|||
12-12-2012, 11:02 AM
(Last edited: 12-12-2012, 02:15 PM by Black Octagon)
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
Hi ToastyX, thanks for all the much-appreciated work you do.
I have a question, which I just asked in a post over at the Overlord forums: http://www.overlordforum.com/viewtopic.p...t=65#p2129 My question, in a nutshell, is whether there are any 'tips' to using CRU in manual mode. I.e., is there a user-friendly explanation of what the different timings mean, or should we just enter a bunch of numbers at random until we (hopefully) settle on a combination that gives us 120Hz @ 2560x1440? My screen has nearly arrived, and I would love to be able to use CRU with at least a vague idea what it is I'm doing. Cheers EDIT: Sorry, this should have been posted in the CRU thread! |
|||
12-13-2012, 04:38 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
It doesn't really matter what the values mean. The goal when dealing with LCD monitors is to reduce the blanking as low as the monitor and video card can handle in order to reduce the horizontal scan rate and the pixel clock. Blanking is the period between each line and each frame that isn't shown on the screen. With the Catleap 2B and Tempest OC monitors, reducing the vertical total to 1450 is the simplest most effective change you can make. It's possible to tweak it down further, but not by much.
For reference: Front Porch + Sync Width + Back Porch = Blanking Active + Blanking = Total Pixel clock is the total number of pixels per second. Horizontal Total * Vertical Total * Refresh Rate = Pixel Clock 2720 * 1450 * 120 = 473280000 (473.28 MHz) Horizontal scan rate is the number of lines per second. Vertical Total * Refresh Rate = Horizontal Scan Rate 1450 * 120 = 174000 (174 KHz) |
|||
12-13-2012, 06:06 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
moin moin
i test the patcher with the new 12.11 Beta 11 and DX11 is not working for me (no Ungine heaven and 3DMark 11) HD7970 . with the old 12.11 Beta 6 everything works. any idea?? greez from germany reinhardrudi |
|||
12-13-2012, 06:35 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
What is it doing? Does it work without the patch?
I tried the Unigine Heaven benchmark with Beta 11 patched, and DirectX 11 is working for me with a 7850. |
|||
12-13-2012, 07:24 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
(12-13-2012 04:38 AM)ToastyX Wrote: It doesn't really matter what the values mean. The goal when dealing with LCD monitors is to reduce the blanking as low as the monitor and video card can handle in order to reduce the horizontal scan rate and the pixel clock. Blanking is the period between each line and each frame that isn't shown on the screen. With the Catleap 2B and Tempest OC monitors, reducing the vertical total to 1450 is the simplest most effective change you can make. It's possible to tweak it down further, but not by much. Thank you for the reply. This helps |
|||
12-13-2012, 02:11 PM
(Last edited: 12-13-2012, 02:12 PM by Randolla)
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
Toasty,
I have my Tempest in hand and like Black Octagon, I am trying to understand this whole manual timing thing. I can get to 115Hz OK but at 120 I get faint lines. Horizontal 2560 1 1 143 145 2705 + Vert 3 3 4 10 1450 - Interlaced is unchecked. I have read your explanation but I do not fully understand it. What is the goal to reach with each number? I know we want to end at 120Hz but what about Pixel clock? Should we try for a lower number or a higher one? How about horizontal scan? You use 174 in your example. Is that what we should shoot for or should it relate to another number in some way? I guess I am so new to this that I must be missing the obvious. Thanks for all your help. |
|||
12-13-2012, 02:34 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
Well, ToastyX has posted elsewhere that "120 Hz requires around 468 to 497.76 MH" (at this resolution).
So for the pixel clock you'll likely need at least 470Mhz if not more. However, as I understand it it's best to keep this low and only go up in increments in order to minimise strain on the cable. Beyond that, the numbers you've posted are confusing (to me) as you appear to have listed more entries than exist in CRU for manual timings? Perhaps you could do a screen capture like in this post: http://www.overlordforum.com/posting.php...=52&p=2188 Alternatively, point out which numbers are front porch, sync width, etc. |
|||
12-13-2012, 03:15 PM
(Last edited: 12-13-2012, 03:22 PM by reinhardrudi)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
(12-13-2012 06:35 AM)ToastyX Wrote: What is it doing? Does it work without the patch? i get the info that i need DX11 hardware .....not more. with beta 6 it works. without the patch---i test. but i have a other patch too,Hybrid PhysX with a 560ti. http://www.ngohq.com/graphic-cards/22136...olved.html |
|||
12-13-2012, 04:21 PM
(Last edited: 12-13-2012, 06:59 PM by Randolla)
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher
(12-13-2012 02:34 PM)Black Octagon Wrote: Well, ToastyX has posted elsewhere that "120 Hz requires around 468 to 497.76 MH" (at this resolution). BlackO, What is confusing you is that I am using the CRU utility that Toasty made that is downlaoded from the some place that he has his patcher. That screen shot is from Nvidia's custom resolution screen and is missing the last set of numbers. I am not at my rig that has all of this now and won't be for a day or two. https://www.monitortests.com/forum/Threa...tility-CRU Download it here and you will see what I mean. Somehow we will figure it all out. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)