Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)

[ToastyX]

(Yesterday 06:05 AM)January_0001 Wrote:  AMDs control panel does not report the new range as 140, no. It reports 120 instead. This is after changing the CTA 861 data block\Freesync Range to 140hz as well. I have however tested this with the HDMI 2.1 ranges changed as well. And it still reports the same

Then AMD's driver is ignoring changes to the VRR/FreeSync range.

[January_0001]

(Yesterday 11:30 AM)ToastyX Wrote:  

(Yesterday 06:05 AM)January_0001 Wrote:  AMDs control panel does not report the new range as 140, no. It reports 120 instead. This is after changing the CTA 861 data block\Freesync Range to 140hz as well. I have however tested this with the HDMI 2.1 ranges changed as well. And it still reports the same

Then AMD's driver is ignoring changes to the VRR/FreeSync range.

There is one change that I found interesting. I changed the load order of DisplayID 1.3 and it DID catch it, believe it or now. BUT now I get VRR instead of freesync premium pro and I'm stuck with 8bit color (8bit color idc about, literally 0 difference in SDR). But is there difference between VRR vs Freesync Premium Pro, usability and performance wise?

[ToastyX]

(Yesterday 02:39 PM)January_0001 Wrote:  There is one change that I found interesting. I changed the load order of DisplayID 1.3 and it DID catch it, believe it or now. BUT now I get VRR instead of freesync premium pro and I'm stuck with 8bit color (8bit color idc about, literally 0 difference in SDR). But is there difference between VRR vs Freesync Premium Pro, usability and performance wise?

CTA-861 is supposed to come first, then DisplayID 1.3. VRR is HDMI's implementation and FreeSync is AMD's implementation. I don't know what the difference would be. Both should support HDR and 10 bpc.